The overall rule is the fact a donor’s ideal to reward is unrestricted. As established in the case of Ranee Khajoorunissa vs. Mst. Roushan Jahan (1876), the Privy Council recognised that a donor could reward all or any portion of their property, whether or not it adversely has an effect https://danteknvoi.free-blogz.com/78513064/the-greatest-guide-to-leasehold-and-tenancy-advocate-in-karachi